JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 18, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Carlos Mario Cortes Hurtado

✓
Topic · hard data
Nulidad Por Aplicación Del Decreto 1382 De 2000
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

5 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se declaró la nulidad de todo lo actuado en la tutela promovida por el menor de la referencia contra el Colegio Bilingüe Internacional del Quindío a partir del auto proferido por el Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura del Quindío, toda vez que se le dio aplicación al Art. 1 del Decreto 1382 que, como ya se dijo, no resulta aplicable por ser contrario a la Carta Política.

En consecuencia, se remitió el expediente al citado Consejo Seccional para que realice el trámite que corresponda conforme a la Ley.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DECLARAR la nulidad de todo lo actuado en la accion de tutela promovida por el menor Carlos Mario Cortes Hurtado, contra el Colegio Bilingue Internacional del Quindio a partir del auto de dieciocho (18) de enero de 2001 proferido por el Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura del Quindio, visible a folio 16 del expediente.
  2. Segundo. REMITASE el expediente por Secretaria General al Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura del Quindio para que, de manera inmediata se le imprima a esta accion de tutela el tramite que corresponda conforme a la Ley.
  3. Notifiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.